On Friday 25 April 2008 02:05:50 hlovatt wrote: > - are you certain you are running the right benchmarks?
Yes. And I have run them on more than one machine and obtained the same results. I also found a bug in the SciGMark code, specifically the C++ was printing the wrong score for the MultPoly test. > The claim that Java is faster than C# seems quite reasonable given this set > of results You are cherry picking one set of results from one machine that are dominated by one test (LU). That is bad science. > - why are yours different than other peoples? I've Googled for SciMark benchmark results on similar hardware and everything indicates that my results are perfectly representative. You never described your machine and operating system precisely. Are you comparing the JVM running on 64-bit Mac OS X with the CLR running in emulated 32-bit Windows? -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?e --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
