On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:49 AM, easieste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And I would put 'Fortress' up there, but I don't know if Sun has > released easily inspectable source code yet.
They have, but Fortress probably shouldn't really be considered a JVM language. If it stays on the JVM it will probably be because it failed as a project. The JVM version is only the reference implementation and is kinda unsuitable for their goals. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
