On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Jochen Theodorou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Martin Probst schrieb: > > >> The more I think about it the more I am certain that I would not want > >> JVM to have an explicit tail call bytecode instruction > > I agree here. The JIT should do that for us.
Does anyone know what, exactly, the IBM JVM offers here? I've heard and found [1] references to TCO or, more specifically, tail-recursion optimization, but haven't found many details. Of course, they are doing this without additional bytecode. Patrick [1] http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/sj/391/suganuma.html --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
