On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:17 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > Most definitely if there are JVM limitations preventing certain > languages from performing well (or being implemented at all) they should > be shared. Probably here if it's more a discussion of high-level > features and high-level ideas for implementing them, but then perhaps > moving to the MLVM list if discussing the dirty details of implementing > those features on OpenJDK/DaVinci.
Btw, where's the MLVM list? And what other key lists are interesting in that regard? (beyond our list here, of course) -- Guillaume Laforge Groovy Project Manager G2One, Inc. Vice-President Technology http://www.g2one.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
