Rich Hickey wrote: > > On Apr 30, 2:06 am, Per Bothner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Perhaps a friendly merger might be possible? > > I think peaceful coexistence is more likely. Clojure has certainly > ceded the backwards-compatibility ground. > > There was a time (you may not remember) when I was considering either > implementing in Kawa or utilizing its infrastructure. But I also > wanted to support .Net, so I went off and reinvented a Lisp core in C#/ > Java. Along the way, I turned Clojure into a functional language, and > dropped .Net.
Sounds like there's a story there. As I understand it, Scala's .NET support has been mostly abandoned too. Care to elaborate? Was it just one too many platforms to support, or were there any technical reasons you stuck to the Java side? - Charlie --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
