Rémi Forax wrote: > To avoid interface explosions, you can erase an object type as Neal > Gafter has proposed: > i.e (String,String => int) is erased to (Object,Object => int) > and add casts at call site. > > I've counted only 927 different erased signatures considering > all public methods of all public classes of rt.jar.
That's pretty good...I must have missed that in the proposal. I presume that could be drastically lowered by playing varargs tricks for argument counts over some threshold (perhaps high). - Charlie --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
