Remi: I have not had any look at your stuff yet, but would it be an appropriate replacement for the "mock" indy jar I've been using? i.e. even if we don't run against the backport, would it enable compiling JRuby's invokedynamic stuff on non-MLVM JVMs?
http://github.com/jruby/indy_mock/tree/master - Charlie On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Rémi Forax<[email protected]> wrote: > > Charles Oliver Nutter a écrit : >> Spectacular effort, Remi...I hope to give it a try soon. I'm also >> hoping I'll have opportunity to help improve it given what we have >> learned about making dispatch fast in JRuby. >> > > All contributions are welcome :) > I haven't your experience. > > Rémi > >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Rémi Forax<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I've just released the first (in fact, the second) version of the JSR >>> 292 backport. >>> See my blog: >>> http://weblogs.java.net/blog/forax/ >>> >>> Dear language runtime developers, >>> I hope you will have fun with it. >>> >>> cheers, >>> Rémi >>> >>> >>> >> >> > >> > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
