Rich Hickey wrote:
I think the problem he's described is a general one, and the true #1 problem for dynamic languages on the JVM (vs the stuff JSR 292 deals with), and will remain a problem for JSR 292.
I think that is not yet really on scope for JSR 292. I started this thread here partially because I wanted to know if it should be made more known there. If enough people agree on that, maybe we can bring that on the mlvm.
bye Jochen -- Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou The Groovy Project Tech Lead (http://groovy.codehaus.org) http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en.
