On Tuesday, 19 April 2011 08:55:15 UTC+1, Miles Sabin wrote: > > I did the RI work as an EG member (I've never been a Sun employee) > because we needed a concrete implementation to play with to validate > the design of the API. This was very much pre-open-source Java times, > however, and to get access to the JDK/JVM sources I had no option but > to sign a IP assignment agreement which handed all the IP to Sun. Much > to everybody's frustration, Sun refused to allow the resulting > modified JVM to be distributed even to the other EG members. > Nasty.
By the way, it seems like multi-tenancy is a major item for EJB 3.2, but given its scheduled release date and history, probably not particularly relevant. "EJB 3.2 is scheduled to be integrated into Java EE 7 in 2012 and will focus on PaaS requirements (mainly multi-tenancy)" http://blogs.sun.com/theaquarium/entry/ejb_3_2_can_start?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheAquarium_en+%28The+Aquarium%29 Best, Ismael > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en.
