Am 28.11.2011 17:38, schrieb Julien Ponge:
Is it very different from the call sites in JRuby? They have a solid
> invokedynamic implementation to look at already. Might inspire you in > a few places :-)
Is it different? afaik JRuby does not care about Class.forName for example. Also I think JRuby doesn't have to handle method calls with a null receiver and other things. I think many things are common, but only with JRuby, with almost any invokedynamic using implementation. But you get into details very fast and then it is not so equal anymore. For the performance very important is also for example the guards you use. that is very much internal and thus very different for JRuby and Groovy.
bye Jochen -- Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou - Groovy Project Tech Lead blog: http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/ german groovy discussion newsgroup: de.comp.lang.misc For Groovy programming sources visit http://groovy-lang.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en.
