Patches item #1004243, was opened at 2004-08-05 18:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by prospero2000us You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=497984&aid=1004243&group_id=61302
Category: None Group: Release 1.3 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Srinivasan Ranganthan (srinirang) >Assigned to: Jim Weaver (jimweaver) Summary: Associating a WebTester with a HTTPUnitDialog Initial Comment: This is in continuation to the email I sent to the developer and user lists in mid-July (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=5117498&forum_id=40831). Thanks for your response guys. Based on the response I got, I have a patch that I'd like to see included. Basically, I needed my tests to be more modular (i.e. each test had a lot of common code between them). I needed the ability for a WebTester to be associated with a different HTTPUnitDialog than the one that was created when beginAt() is called. So, I have added a constructor to WebTester that takes a HTTPUnitDialog. I have attached a patch for this against HEAD (which seems to be broken btw, so I couldn't test my patch. But I have been using it for a while now without any problems). I'd like to know what the community thinks about this proposed patch. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jim Weaver (prospero2000us) Date: 2004-09-30 11:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=597548 Incorporated this idea as a setter instead of a constructor. Also changed access modifier for setFormElementWithLabel as suggested by submitter. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Srinivasan Ranganthan (srinirang) Date: 2004-08-23 19:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1097914 Does this mean this patch will be included in 1.3? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Dashorst (dashorst) Date: 2004-08-23 16:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=695103 I repaired HEAD, the tests should run now as normal. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Srinivasan Ranganthan (srinirang) Date: 2004-08-18 21:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1097914 I'd like to know what the community thinks of this. Good, bad, ok - but can be improved? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=497984&aid=1004243&group_id=61302 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Jwebunit-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jwebunit-development
