I'm +-0.

- We should have a short feature-freeze, bug-sqashing time before the release.

- Also, we're about to add the feedback code, so we should decide if we want it
in the release or not.

- I agree that Jyve should be released as a 2.x version, because Turbine is 2.x,
too, so that would just be consistent with the framework.

Btw, updated german localization is on its way, but I'm at home (quite ill) at
the moment so I only have remote access to our intranet so it may take a little
while to sort things out.

I'd probably like to wait for another week or two until we start putting things
together for a release.

-Jonas

jon * wrote:

> As a policy of mine, I will never release 1.0 versions again. The reason is
> simple. There are a lot of idiots in this world who won't use a piece of
> software because it is 1.0. My goal in life is to totally debunk software
> versions as a sign of stability/maturity.
>
> So, what do you all think of me taking a snapshot of Turbine and releasing a
> Jyve 2.0 with it? The code is pretty stable at this point and is running
> just great. I made a lot of fixes and additions last weekend and I'm pretty
> happy with it now and want to attract more developers to working on it.
>
> comments?
>
> -jon
>
> --
> Come to the first official Apache Software Foundation
> Conference!  <http://ApacheCon.Com/>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives and Other:  <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
> Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other:  <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to