on 10/12/2000 9:50 AM, "Bernie Hoeneisen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tend for using rather Velocity (instead of webmacro), mostly for the
> following reasons:
> - Velocity is "our own product; in case changes are needed there, things
> get much easier; same people Velocity/Turbine;
> for sure no licensing troubles
> - Velocity is more promissing; already now it seams to perfrom much
> better than webmacro; better parser
> - It would be great to have a running example for velocity; see also
> discussions on Turbine list about Jyve as an example for Turbine
>
> other opinions?
+1 on Velocity.
-1 on WebMacro.
Everyone should be getting prepared to move away from WM. Period.
-jon
--
http://scarab.tigris.org/ | http://noodle.tigris.org/
http://java.apache.org/ | http://java.apache.org/turbine/
http://www.working-dogs.com/ | http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
http://www.collab.net/ | http://www.sourcexchange.com/
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
