11 July 2002 Status report -------------------------- Scott:
>On the sender side, after I hit >"Okay" and the status window shows "waiting for confirmation...", >there's no need for it to time out. That is, don't even bother >prompting the sender after 15 seconds with "Continue to wait?". >Just always continue to wait. As long as the Cancel button >works, and the Sender knows that the receiver hasn't confirmed >the transfer yet, it's a fine usage model. Done. I have altered all the waiting algorithm. And there still is an issue about this. If sender clicks Cancel when the receiver is just about to accept the file - what then? Should I close the Accept File panel? > If there are no other Kaboodle PC's on the LAN, and if > Kaboodle is not VPN'd, then the file-transfer dropdown > box should not be empty. It can instead give an error > message: "Sorry...Kaboodle can only transfer files to > other PC's that are also running Kaboodle". I added the exact label. It takes all the room of the Step#1. Note that I have also swapped Step#1 and Step#2 since this order seems to me more correct. Personally I always choose my party first as I am not sure the one is necessarily acceptable and only then I choose the file as I am certain about my own files. Q: After the receiver has accepted the file, should I prompt they to see the details the way I do for the sender? Q: In the silent mode ("Do not Ask" option is set), is the final popup message "Success / Terminated" really needed? >Yes, we should offset the work so that the thread which >reads the file to the buffer also does the encryption. I continue with that. -Oleg ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek PC Mods, Computing goodies, cases & more http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Kaboodle-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaboodle-devel