VK:
        Looks fixed, thanks!

-Scott

On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, mailbox wrote:

> Hello Scott,
> I could replicate the bug. The bug was introduced due to new WorkDevice
> class addition.
> I have fixed the bug. Please test it again.
>
> Regards,
> Varsha
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott C. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "mailbox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Kaboodle-devel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 12:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [Kaboodle-devel] Bug Report, 20 July
>
>
> > VK:
> > One more datapoint: if I restart Kaboodle, the
> > inactive device does get correctly put into the "known
> > but inactive" device list which gets ping'd regularly,
> > and the GUI updates as it should.
> >
> > To clarify further, I can see from the network
> > traffic that Kaboodle has two ping lists: "known and
> > active devices" which get ping'd roughly every 15
> > seconds, and "known but inactive" which get ping'd
> > roughly every 20 seconds. This is good.
> >
> > -Scott
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 20 Jul 2002, Scott C. Best wrote:
> >
> > > VK:
> > > Just to confirm:
> > >
> > > > One quick bug report, then some replies: devices in
> > > > the GUI don't go inactive anymore. I can see in the network
> > > > traffic that the inactive status has been detected, but the
> > > > deactivation of the icon isn't currently happening.
> > >
> > > I'm seeing this problem still, today. My GUI is
> > > showing 8 devices, but the network traffic is showing only
> > > 6 devices being ping'd every 5 seconds. It should be seven
> > > (the Kaboodle machine shouldn't ping itself). Somehow, one of
> > > the "known devices" fell out of the "ping list" without the
> > > GUI being updated to show that the device went inactive.
> > > This doesn't happen all the time, but it does happen.
> > >
> > > As you know, a "known device" should stay in the
> > > "ping list" so that when it comes back, we can detect it
> > > quickly.
> > >
> > > Perhaps, as a safety check, we can have Kaboodle
> > > rebuild the "ping list" when the user hits "Refresh". This
> > > way we can be sure that what's shown in the GUI is the
> > > current status of the devices on the LAN.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > Scott
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Now for replies:
> > > >
> > > > > > Hello! Sorry about the delay in replying. Speaking
> > > > > > of delays...the latest version of the Kaboodle sniffer seems
> > > > > > to have slowed down again. Did your "timing adjustments" on
> > > > > > the ARP sniffing get undone somehow?
> > > > >
> > > > > No. Actually the other code changes to NID in this week shouldn't
> > > > > affect the sniffer code.
> > > >
> > > > The performance I mentioned may have been related to
> > > > the bugs fixed late this week. Which is to say, the discovery
> > > > thread was working well today.
> > > >
> > > > > > As for your question:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 3. At startup, Kaboodle should check to see if another
> PC
> > > > > > > > > > >    on the LAN is running Kaboodle. If it is, it should
> get
> > > > > > > > > > >    the NID from that PC, and *not* re-run its own
> network
> > > > > > > > > > >    discovery. Right now, every PC runs its own LAN
> discovery,
> > > > > > > > > > >    and sometimes they come up with different answers.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What should happen for the Group index and icon index in the
> above
> > > > > > > scenario? For e.g say On PC1, I change the group of some PC
> (xyz) on
> > > > > > > my LAN to Macintosh group. Then I started Kaboodle on PC2. In
> this
> > > > > > > case PC (xyz) will belong to which group on PC2?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The way I see it, there should be a unique NID for the
> > > > > > whole network, not one per PC. So if I put PC1 into the Macintosh
> > > > > > group, it should move into that icon group for every Kaboodle
> > > > > > instance on the LAN *and* for any Kaboodle's that are VPN'd
> > > > > > with this network.
> > > > > >
> > > > > Does this mean that the kaboodle GUI and device properties of all
> type
> > > > > of devices on each machine on LAN should be exactly identical?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I think it has to be this way. I cannot think of a good
> > > > model where the GUI's a device properties are only "partially" identic
> al.
> > > >
> > > > Think of it in the context of a Kaboodle VPN: if I am engaged
> > > > with other Kaboodle users, and they make changes to their GUI or
> device
> > > > properties, when should my GUI update? When the changes are made to
> the
> > > > VPN master, or to any node? Gets confusing quickly. The easiest answer
> is:
> > > > every LAN has a unique NID. Any changes to the Kaboodle GUI or a
> device's
> > > > are recorded in the NID. NID's are propagated ASAP to all Kaboodle
> parties
> > > > displaying that NID in a GUI.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Could you please explain me the following
> > > > > 1. What should happen in case of group additions and deletions?
> > > > > 2. What should happen on device property change?
> > > > > 3. What should happen if some kaboodle instance detects the new
> device?
> > > > > The current code does not pass the device ID during exchanging the
> NID
> > > > > information and if we want the exact NID information to be displayed
> in each
> > > > > instance of the kaboodle on the LAN then we need to add this
> capability of
> > > > > keeping unique device_ID on a LAN. Is this adequate?
> > > >
> > > > If I make a group additions or deletion on PC1, it should first
> > > > be recorded in the Kaboodle NID on PC1. This change should then be
> > > > propagated to all Kaboodle devices via the NID synchronization thread.
> > > > All device property changes should be propagated similarly to all
> Kaboodle
> > > > devices via NID synchronization.
> > > >
> > > > As far as a unique device_ID, we definitely need one. Any Kaboodle
> > > > device in the world should be referencable by using first a Network_ID
> > > > and then a Device_ID local to that network. So if I'm VPN'd with 5
> other
> > > > users, and each has 10 devices on their LAN, I might be able to
> initiate
> > > > a VNC connection to "Network-3_Device-5".
> > > >
> > > > Hope this helps. Have a good weekend!
> > > >
> > > > cheers,
> > > > Scott
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > > > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Kaboodle-devel mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaboodle-devel
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Kaboodle-devel mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaboodle-devel
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > _______________________________________________
> > Kaboodle-devel mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaboodle-devel
> >
>
>



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Kaboodle-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaboodle-devel

Reply via email to