Hello Scott.
I see that Gnutella server works correctly now.
Current Kaboodle version has VPN bug:
it's impossible to make remote connection via Gnutella server.
But previous Kaboodle version from September 25 works correctly.
I see that current Kaboodle version uses ZeBeDee component.
Please inform me about your specification:
how ZeBeDee component works in the process of remote connection
(if ZeBeDee used in above).
- Igor

----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott C. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Igor Kotelevsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 8:12 PM
Subject: Re: VPN bug


> Igor:
> I checked, and the Gnutella server did go down. I was
> working with it during my VPN tests, so it died between then
> and now. I've restarted it. I'm surprised that the "Handshake
> OK" message didn't report that the server was down. Shouldn't
> it say something like "Server Unavailable"?
>
> To clarify: the Gnutella service on 66.123.20.59
> listens on port 4183. It doesn't listen to port 4182. Kaboodle,
> on the other hand, doesn't listen to 4183. It listens to port
> 4182, for the exchange of VPN Control Channel data. It's
> unfortunate that the port numbers are consecutive, because it
> causes confusion.
>
> Testing your recent commits now.
>
> thanks,
> Scott
>
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Igor Kotelevsky wrote:
>
> > Hello Scott.
> > I see that bug also. I think that Gnutella server have a problem.
> > Please see my arguments.
> > I tested the previous Kaboodle version from 25 september and
> > it have the bug also.
> > Then I tested our little utility *TestGnuSock* and
> > it show that Gnutella server doesn't works correctly now.
> > In your e-mail you say about 2 numbers of Gnutella port: #4182 and
#4183.
> > As I know there is one #4183 in the Kaboodle source code.
> > But I tested *TestGnuSock* for both numbers.
> > Here is the result:
> > // BEGIN OF TEST
> > 0 Connect( IP address "66.123.20.59", port 4183 ),
> > Date: November 07 2002 year, 14 hours 00 minutes
> > 1 CGnuSock receives notification <OnConnect( ErrorCode = 10061,
> > No connection could be made because
> > the target machine actively refused it. )>
> >
> > 0 Connect( IP address "66.123.20.59", port 4182 ),
> > Date: November 07 2002 year, 14 hours 10 minutes
> > 1 CGnuSock receives notification <OnConnect( ErrorCode = 10060,
> > A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly
> > respond after a period of time,
> > or established connection failed because connected host has failed to
> > respond. )>
> > // END OF TEST
> >
> > I implemented some little things for *TestGnuSock*.
> > Now it shows a date of test.
> > Also there possible to save result of test into the file.
> > All my changes are in the CVS server.
> >
> > - Igor
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Scott C. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Igor Kotelevsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 8:43 PM
> > Subject: Re: VPN bug
> >
> >
> > > Igor:
> > > Looking at my LAN traffic after I hit the "Connect"
> > > button, I'm not sure that the discovery is working. I don't
> > > see any traffic exchanged between the two endpoints. What I
> > > *do* see is the request to Gnutella.GetEngaged.Net, and then
> > > multiple requests to the IP address in the Partnership file.
> > > Then, in my VPN status window, that IP address is now shown
> > > as a Gnutella server with a "Handshake OK" status.
> > >
> > > Here's what I think: every time I successfully make
> > > a connection to a VPN partner, I should put their IP address
> > > into a file, or registry entry. When I next try to connect
> > > with them, I should try those IP addresses *first*, on port
> > > 4182, bypassing Gnutella completely. If they fail to connect,
> > > I should fall back to a Gnutella search.
> > >
> > > Of course, the first time I connect with a Partner,
> > > I won't have such a file or registry entry. In that case, I
> > > should use the IP address in the Partnership file first. If
> > > that fails, then fallback to Gnutella.
> > >
> > > Importantly: those IP address I try should *not* end
> > > up in the list of Gnutella servers. I should not see any traffic
> > > to port 4183 except to machines in the list of Gnutella servers.
> > >
> > > hope this helps,
> > >
> > > Scott
> > >
> > > On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Igor Kotelevsky wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello Scott.
> > > > I continue VPN bug debugging process.
> > > > I know that Kaboodle receives remote network data,
> > > > which is *exactly* correct, but GUI 'don't want' to show that data.
> > > > - Igor
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Kaboodle-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaboodle-devel

Reply via email to