Hi Pat, --- Patrick Tullmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ito wrote: > > On FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE, make failed. I think I > should upgrade to > > the newest release if I have time. > > Its the same on 4.6-STABLE and on a fairly old > 5.0-CURRENT box. > > Why isn't the configure variable HAVE_DECLARED_SWAB > being set > correctly? (Is that the g++/gcc distinction Dalibor > mentioned??)
No idea, really. It seems to be a gcc on linux issue, according to the comment in the config-mem.h file. Should I ask gcc/libc developers ? Any idea whom to bother first? > Maybe the configure test should be updated to > include <string.h> too? > (Right not it only seems to check unistd.h and > stdlib.h...) I'll try it with <string.h>, if that fails with gcc on linux, then I guess I'll revert to the old form, and #ifdef LINUX it. Is LINUX the right platform define? Every platform seems to have its own ideas about swab. I remember my last attempt to compile on mingw also gave me some swab prototype problems. As the ssize_t definition is by the OpenGroup, should I file a bug report for FreeBSD somewhere? If so, where? cheers, dalibor topic __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ kaffe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe