hi Helmer, --- Helmer Krämer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i think even i<k is still wrong ;) n Is the length of the string > and m is the length of the pattern, so the largest possible start > index of the pattern is n-m-1. Therefore it should be n-m-1 and > <=k or n-m and <k, shouldn't it? I've checked Guilhem's patch in as it is. But your stricter interpretation makes sense. Could you build a rt.jar with the current CVS head, and another with a stricter limit and check if they are equal, and that the stricter interpretation passes the regression test suite? cheers, dalibor topic __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ kaffe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
