Probably depends on your needs in terms of performance. JIT3 would probably be easier to fix to get working, but it is definitely a lot slower, as shown in the paper. JIT4 is relatively stable, but definitely has more bugs, which are difficult to fix b/c you need to be able to debug a compiler.
mike > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > >>>>> "mike" == mikey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > mike> Hey guys, Not sure what this about expect I'm being refereed to > mike> in the third person. :) I've been maintaining my version of the > mike> code here since Transvirtual went belly up. I still use it, but > mike> not for much longer. > > mike> I have no problem handing it over, as long as the code has the > mike> proper acknowledgements, but I will not be able to help with > mike> much support at the moment. > > mike> What is this for? > > I need a JIT for kaffe that runs on mipsel-linux, and was > investigating JIT4 as a possibility. Fixing JIT3 (which is apparently > broken ATM) is also a possibility. > > Cheers, > > - -- > Casey Marshall || [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> > > iD8DBQFAQ5ZGgAuWMgRGsWsRAp/SAJ0Tj43PnuHYr6RfzwkahbjO2+HxSQCfTnA8 > hE7B74y94ljiQ1nf9KrkI0g= > =jRNh > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- -------------- - - - - - - --- \ Mike Chen \ Gates #316 \ \\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ Cell: (415) 640-3654 \ \\ http://www.stanford.edu/~broccoli \ \ \ === = = = = = = =============== _______________________________________________ kaffe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe