On Sat, 15 May 2004 18:32:39 +0200 Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There will be a slight performance loss for JIT > though: currently the JIT is putting the pointers to translated methods > directly in the vtable. To be compatible with intrp and other way of > handling methods we must put a pointer to Method. Why do we have to put a pointer to Method into the vtable to be compatible? Have you considered modifying intrp so it stores a pointer to the bytecode in the vtable (and allocates the bytecode so that GC_getObjectBase(address of some bytecode) returns the address of the Method* the bytecode belongs to)? And what happens to xdebugging when the vtable doesn't contain a pointer to the code of the method? Regards, Helmer _______________________________________________ kaffe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
