To be precise, I said: > The same code fragment exists in jit but it looks that >cmp_ref_const itself has naver been invoked for jit.
The cmp_ref_const itself was invoked in jit, but only with v == 0. Which means this function calls op_tst_a (test 0 for register) rather than calling incorrect cmpi. Kiyo _______________________________________________ kaffe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
