On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Helmer [ISO-8859-15] Krämer wrote: > glibc doesn't seem to properly define __FLOAT_WORD_ORDER for all > combinations (vfp / fpa) [1]. How about > > #if defined(__ARMEL__) && !defined(__VFP_FP__) > #define DOUBLE_ORDER_OPPOSITE > #endif > > ?
Thanks, looks good (I'm mainly using crosstool generated compilers so __FLOAT_WORD_ORDER was correct in my case)! Regards, Jari _______________________________________________ kaffe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe