[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-78?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13084229#comment-13084229
 ] 

Jay Kreps commented on KAFKA-78:
--------------------------------

Shouldn't the mx4j port come from kafka config, why make it a system property?

What happens if two kafka servers are instantiated in the same jvm? We do this 
for testing quite a lot.

We should also have a config to disable this feature.

> add optional mx4j support to expose jmx over http
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-78
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-78
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Chris Burroughs
>            Assignee: Chris Burroughs
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.7
>
>         Attachments: k78-v1.txt, k78-v2.txt
>
>
> In the fun world of operations and monitoring sometimes HTTP is a better 
> choice than 'real' jmx for alerting.  mx4j exposes jmx beans over HTTP (sadly 
> with xml).  Attached patch is a scala port of CASSANDRA-1068 that optionally 
> loads mx4j if it is present on the classpath.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to