You'd think so but the documentation seems to be pretty clear, it's optional. How odd.
Regards, Alan On Aug 23, 2011, at 9:35 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > I think it has to be <groupId>org.apache.kafka</groupId> to make sure > maven could resolve to the right namespace in the central repo > > - Henry > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Chris Burroughs > <[email protected]> wrote: >> So from what I can tell it's common practice [1] for Java projects to >> switch to using the the org.apache namespace. Scala/kafka doesn't even >> follow the reverse FQDM convention, so I don't see a need to change the >> source code. But what about for packaging? Ought a project depending >> on kafka be using: >> >> <groupId>kafka</groupId> >> <artifactId>core-kafka</artifactId> >> >> or >> >> <groupId>org.apache.kafka</groupId> >> <artifactId>core-kafka</artifactId> >> >> >> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#repackaging >>
