[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-49?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13156494#comment-13156494
 ] 

Prashanth Menon commented on KAFKA-49:
--------------------------------------

Agreed, we need to change the wire protocol to include protocol version, it'll 
save future effort and solve backwards/forward compatibility issues.  Though I 
really like Taylor's idea of reusing the first byte of the requestId for 
version, it does limit us to 256 versions and 256 possible request types; not a 
drastic limitation, but still.  Add on to the fact that we're changing 
requestId's by collapsing the multi-fetch to just fetch and multi-produce to 
just produce and the other large changes happening with replication, 
maintaining backwards compatibility with < 0.7 seems like an unnecessarily 
significant effort.  My two cents is just to introduce a new format going 
forward, and leave room for enhancements. 

Did a quick look through the wiki, looks good at a glance.  I wasn't aware of 
all the other protocol changes!
                
> Add acknowledgement to the produce request.
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-49
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-49
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Jun Rao
>
> Currently, the produce request doesn't get acknowledged. We need to have a 
> broker send a response to the producer and have the producer wait for the 
> response before sending the next request.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to