[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-48?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13212329#comment-13212329
 ] 

Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-48:
------------------------------

Overall, the patch looks good. Some comments:

1. DelayedItem.compareTo: yourEnd should be delayed.createdMs + delayed.delayMs
2. Suppose that a client issues MultiFetch requests on a hot topic and a cold 
topic. What can happen is that the watcher list for the cold topic won't be 
cleaned up for a long time. One solution is to have a cleaner thread that 
periodically wakes up to remove satisfied items. The cleaner thread can be used 
to clean up the DelayQueue too.
3. MessageSetSend.empty is not used.

                
> Implement optional "long poll" support in fetch request
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-48
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-48
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Alan Cabrera
>            Assignee: Jay Kreps
>         Attachments: KAFKA-48.patch
>
>
> Currently, the fetch request is non-blocking. If there is nothing on the 
> broker for the consumer to retrieve, the broker simply returns an empty set 
> to the consumer. This can be inefficient, if you want to ensure low-latency 
> because you keep polling over and over. We should make a blocking version of 
> the fetch request so that the fetch request is not returned until the broker 
> has at least one message for the fetcher or some timeout passes.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to