Sorry, this was sitting in my draft box. Perfect! Thanks for checking!
+1 Regards, Alan On Jun 22, 2012, at 6:09 PM, Jun Rao wrote: > Alan, > > I found the list of jars that you published during the 0.7.0 release. The > new jars in the 0.7.1 release are the following: > commons-cli: AL2 > commons-el: AL2 > commons-net: AL2 > commons-io: AL2 > commons-compress: AL2 > core: Eclipse Public License 1.0 > hsqldb: BSD > jasper-compiler: AL2 > jasper-runtime: AL2 > jets3t: AL2 > jetty: AL2 > jetty-util: AL2 > jsp: AL2 > jsp-api: AL2 > kfs: AL2 > xmlenc: BSD > rat-core: AL2 > rat-tasks: AL2 > snappy: AL2 > > As you can see, they are all Apache compatible licenses. > > Thanks, > > Jun > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com>wrote: > >> >> On Jun 22, 2012, at 3:16 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: >> >>> Alan- >>> >>> Please recheck your results using the 0.7.0 release and not your email >>> archives to make sure your process is consistent. Please also let us >>> know how you're composing your list so your concerns are reproducible. >>> We can't be chasing ghosts. >> >> Sorry, I may have been vague with my references to the email archives. >> >> My vote on 0.7.0 was based on the the vetting of the list of jars that I >> published on the mailing list last year. The current thinking is that we >> only need to vet the delta of what was voted on for 0.7.0 and what we >> currently get for 0.7.1. So, I am using the list of jars that I voted on >> for 0.7.0 and am getting a delta of more than one jar when I compare it >> against the jars downloaded for 0.7.1. >> >> >> Regards, >> Alan >> >>
