I think we need a "features" tag as well. Some JIRAs are features, not optimizations -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-42 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-43 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-347 They also involve multi-week effort, versus little optimizations that require ~1 week effort. Thanks, Neha On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Neha Narkhede <neha.narkh...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1. This is very cool ! > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Prashanth Menon > <prashanth.men...@gmail.com> wrote: >> This is pretty awesome, thanks for setting it up Joel! >> >> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Joel Koshy <jjkosh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+replication+development >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Joel Koshy <jjkosh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > I'm thinking of putting together an 0.8 development dashboard using the >>> > wiki's jiraissues plugin. In order to classify issues, I will need to >>> label >>> > issues as follows: >>> > >>> > core-0.8: core features (this is mostly done) >>> > bugs: known bugs >>> > tools: e.g., migration tool, producer performance improvements, etc. >>> > testfw: test framework related >>> > optimization: not bugs, but enhancements >>> > >>> > If anyone can think of better or more classifications, let me know. Since >>> > I will need to apply these labels there will be some noise on the list >>> so I >>> > will try to get them all done in large blocks once I start (sometime >>> > tomorrow). >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > >>> > Joel >>> > >>> > >>>