This configuration can be done with out ZK, correct? On Jul 26, 2012, at 11:43 AM, Joel Koshy <[email protected]> wrote:
> I see - yes that should be fine. i.e., as long as the topics are distinct > then you can mirror both ways and the topic "owned" by each machine should > be read-only on the other machine. > > Thanks, > > Joel > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Christian Carollo <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi Joel, >> >> Thanks for getting back to me. I actually missed your response. >> >> What I really am trying to is… >> >> Have two machines each running a single broker (not clustered)? One topic >> is homed on machine A >> an mirrored to machine B and another topic is homed on machine B and >> mirrored to machine A. >> >> When machine A goes down machine B can take over as owner of the topic >> that machine A was previously owner of. >> >> Is that clearer? >> >> Thanks >> Christian >> >> On Jul 18, 2012, at 10:21 AM, Joel Koshy <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Missed this thread - can you elaborate a bit more on your use case? I'm >>> assuming you are referring to the inter-cluster (mirroring) feature (and >>> not replication). It isn't really possible for two clusters to mirror >> each >>> other - as the mirroring would never end, at least the way it is >>> implemented right now. If you want the aggregate data from all your >>> data-centers to be available in each data-center there are some >> topologies >>> that may work for you. >>> >>> Joel >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Christian Carollo <[email protected] >>> wrote: >>> >>>> We are looking to implement a multi-mirror queue architecture and >>>> wondering if there are any known documents or examples. In general, we >> are >>>> looking to setup two Kafka clusters that replicate or mirror one >> another. >>>> >>>> Christian >> >>
