Hello, And it is simple to swith into default ?
Thanks Le jeu. 6 sept. 2018 à 22:14, Thomas De Schampheleire < patrickdeping...@gmail.com> a écrit : > The default branch is perfectly usable in production. It is stable in the > sense that there are no instabilities in operation. > As it is the version under development, it could be considered 'unstable' > in the sense that things are changing. > > /Thomas > > On Thu, Sep 6, 2018, 21:47 Paul Borel <paul.bo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I prefer that be stable. that mean using branch stable ? >> >> >> Le jeu. 6 sept. 2018 à 21:44, Mads Kiilerich <m...@kiilerich.com> a >> écrit : >> >>> On 09/06/2018 09:37 PM, Paul Borel wrote: >>> > Hello, >>> > >>> > Did you consider to adapt the UI to be responsive ? >>> >>> The 'default' branch is using Bootstrap, mostly contributed by Dominik. >>> Thomas recently proposed a solution to the big remaining problem of a >>> good way to use Bootstrap from a GPL application. Let's hope we soon >>> will release it. But it is perfectly usable from the default branch, and >>> in many ways better than the stable branch, only less "stable". >>> >>> /Mads >>> >> >> >> -- >> Paul >> _______________________________________________ >> kallithea-general mailing list >> kallithea-general@sfconservancy.org >> https://lists.sfconservancy.org/mailman/listinfo/kallithea-general >> > -- Paul
_______________________________________________ kallithea-general mailing list kallithea-general@sfconservancy.org https://lists.sfconservancy.org/mailman/listinfo/kallithea-general