On 17/04/2023 15:45, Manuel Jacob wrote:
On 17/04/2023 13.39, Mads Kiilerich wrote:
Hi
That seems to be a Mercurial 6.4 regression, introduced by
87f0155d68aa .
Can you confirm, and will you follow up upstream?
I can do that, but I would be interested in how you found out.
At first I couldn't reproduce. Then I found a setup where I could
reproduce. I figured it could be a hg regression, and bisected hg.
/Mads
_______________________________________________
kallithea-general mailing list
kallithea-general@sfconservancy.org
https://lists.sfconservancy.org/mailman/listinfo/kallithea-general
