Hello everybody, My question is simple: what justifies having inboxes and outboxes as opposed to just passing around references to actors? The way I see it, is that it's just a way to do dependency injection, i.e. the actor doesn't know who's it communicating with, but passing actor references fulfills that purpose just as well.
I'm asking because I'm using my own relatively simple actor framework that used to have inboxes and outboxes, but ever since I removed them, i haven't been missing them (or even quite the contrary—I think it's much easier to work with actors without). Regards, Erik Allik -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kamaelia" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/kamaelia/-/lGhDRQZdDt8J. To post to this group, send email to kamaelia@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to kamaelia+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/kamaelia?hl=en.
