On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Mark Hindess
<[email protected]>wrote:

>
> In message <[email protected]>,
> Carmine Cristallo writes:
> >
> > Ciao!
> > We've committed the code under trunk/import (as specified here:
> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#clean-up-best-practice
> > )
> > Now... our assumption is that the "import" directory is there only to
> > contain the initial code contribution, and that we need to do a svn
> > copy of the whole thing into trunk to start the actual development, Is
> > this correct? In this case, should we also copy the NOTICE and LICENSE
> > files from trunk/import into trunk?
>
> You now have kato/trunk/import which means everyone checking out the
> working-in-progress code also gets a copy of the original import.  I
> doubt very much that this was what was originally intended by the
> author of the best practice document.
>
> I'd probably:
>
>  svn move https://.../kato/trunk/import \
>           https://.../kato/branches/import
>
> unless one of your mentors has a better suggestion.
>

No other suggests were made so I've done as you suggested.

>
> Other minor issues I spotted as the commit messages went by ...
>
>
> org.apache.kato.tools.jdi/src/com/ibm/tools/jdi/DTFJReader.java lines
> 220 and 263 contain typos of the word 'attempted'.
>
>
> Some of the */.settings/org.eclipse.jdt.ui.prefs files contain templates
> with things like "Property of IBM" which probably wont be appropriate
> for new files.
>
> Fixed.

>
> It is probably worth doing:
>
>  svn propset svn:eol-style native filename
>
> on all the text/code files so all developers see line endings
> consistently for their OS.  Committers should probably consider using
> http://www.apache.org/dev/svn-eol-style.txt to ensure that new files are
> created with this property.  The spurious whitespace changes in commit
> messages you get if you don't set this can be really misleading so it is
> good to get this right from the start.
>
> Congratulations on the first commit.  Nice work.
>
> Regards,
>  Mark.
>
>
>

Reply via email to