I'd vote for not doing it Stuart, your on the hook as you're down as the tutor. Perhaps we can go for the next ApacheCon?
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Stuart Monteith <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > I also think it's too early. There is no sign on the mailing list of people > trying out what we have already - I'd like more insight from community > members > before taking it to a tutorial. > > > Steve Poole wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Stuart Monteith <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi, >>> It turns out that of our submissions to ApacheConUS 2009, one was >>> accepted. Oddly enough, it was a tutorial rather than a presentation. >>> Here are the details: >>> http://us.apachecon.com/c/acus2009/speakers/282 >>> >>> Before such a thing occurs there should be a release of some sort of our >>> project's code. >>> >>> I was wondering what people (esp. mentors) thought about that. The code >>> itself would be like an alpha release. This would hopefully encourage >>> discussion and early adoption, and possible participation. >>> >>> The steps I think would should take towards a release would include: >>> o Writing documentation >>> o Improving the website - it's difficult to ascertain what we are >>> offering. The binaries would be linkable from here. >>> o Establishing on this mailing list our current state. >>> >>> There is a release process drafted here: >>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html , but I'm not >>> sure how achievable all of that is at this stage of the project. >>> >>> I'll be very interested in what everyone's thoughts are. >>> >>> >>> One question I have is what is the expectation on tutorials at >>> >>> >> ApacheCon? I'm sure we can create the necessary material but I worry >> about offering a tutorial for something as early in its life as Kato. >> >> Thanks, >> >> >>> Stuart >>> >>> -- >>> Stuart Monteith >>> http://blog.stoo.me.uk/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > -- > Stuart Monteith > http://blog.stoo.me.uk/ > >
