Hi,
I'm cross posting this between kato-dev and kato-spec as it is
important to both the Kato incubator and JSR-326. It is a discussion on
the general incubator mailing list.
There is also a discussion, initiated by Robert, about parking the Kato
incubator "[VOTE] Park Kato". There have also been discussions on the
reporting for Kato.
Either way, please read. A decision will have to be made soon about what
to do about Kato. I'd rather we decide rather than having that decision
made for us.
Regards,
Stuart
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Kato status (Was: Actively retiring projects)
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:13:23 +0000
From: Robert Burrell Donkin <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Jukka Zitting
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
There seems to be some people assuming that the IPMC wants to
terminate the Kato podling. Looking back I wonder if my original
status review was the source of this:
:-)
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Jukka Zitting <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote:
2008-11-06 Kato
S: Zero activity.
R: Terminate.
This was based on looking at commit and kato-dev@ list activity, both
zero or very low for an extended amount of time. There was no recent
status report.
AFAICT Soon after entry, the standards process stalled. This stopped
active development. Most of the activity after then has been the
community trying to find a way around the standards issue, with little
success. Progress depends on Oracle coming to a decision (one way or
the other) about the future of the standard. This might happen today,
tomorrow or in ten years time.
Robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
