Hello,

this email is an answer to comment 4 in bug 18357 by Jürgen Spitzmüller.
https://gna.org/bugs/?18357#comment4
I am sending it to this mailing list as it may be interesting for a broader 
audience.

> What are the plans wrt to this (in terms of release cycles)? Shall I try
> to implement just the RequiredItems, OptionalItems and TypeIndependent
> flags to the current bibtex.rc file for 0.4, and we do the cleanup and
> outsourcing for 0.5, or do you plan to release 0.4 first and postpone
> this altogether? Both is fine with me, SVN is a huge step forward from
> 0.3 now anyway.

I plan to stabilize the source code for a release of version 0.4 as soon as 
possible. This means I will branch the current SVN trunk into the 0.4 branch. 
Bug fixes (not new features) from SVN trunk will be backported into this 
branch if possible.
In the 0.4 branch, 1-3 beta releases will be tagged until we deem it 
stable/good enough to ship it (i.e. release it). I am estimating 2-4 weeks 
until the release of 0.4.

You can check the TODO list in SVN about which bugs are to be fixed for future 
releases. If I haven't miscounted, there are no showstopper bugs left for 0.4. 
Feature requests such as yours will be made in the main trunk which will 
become 0.5 in a few months.
If I missed any open bug or feature request, please let me know about it so 
that I can update the TODO list.

-- Thomas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
kbibtex-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/kbibtex-user

Reply via email to