Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up

[Michael Elizabeth Chastain]

Eric Raymond writes:
> That's exactly the approach I've taken until very recently.  But the
> compiler and configurator codebase is stable now.  It seemed to me
> time to think about improving the rulebase.

Ah, that is where we have different views.  I think CML2 would be better
off if you shelved "improving the rulebase" and focussed on "integrating
into the kernel".

I'm not very good at getting things integrated into the kernel (it
took me a year to get CONFIG_SMP in).  Alan is certainly an expert on
integration hurdles.

Do you have a checklist from Linus about what he wants to see?

Michael

_______________________________________________
kbuild-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel