On Thursday 06 December 2001 12:25 pm, Alan Cox wrote: > > So has anyone had time to test the Python version 1.5 based CML2 that > > was posted? Would that make it more acceptable? > > For 2.5 its a great leap forward. For 2.4 its irrelevant. Its simply not > the way stable kernel trees are run, even for people who think they are > above the rules and traditions
Ooh, I can't resist... "You mean like Linus?" (Ducks, runs, looks innocent, runs some more...) Rob P.S. Can we seperate "add new subsystem y prime" and "remove old subsystem y". LIke the new and old SCSI error handling, which have been in the tree in parallel for some time? Did I hear Eric ever suggest removing the old configurator for 2.4? Anybody? _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
