On January 22, 2002 12:11 am, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On January 21, 2002 06:05 pm, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote: > > Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > > > > I detect a slight lack of symmetry here, shouldn't it be "make > > > autoconfig"? Pardon me if this has been beaten to^W^W discussed above. > > > > Yes. It should be "make autoconfig", for symmterty reasons :-) > > I called the files and the project autoconfigure, because > > 'autoconfig' is already an utility made by GNU. (not related > > to kernel) > > This is kernel autoconfig, different namespace, same idea. I don't think > you have a problem. Besides, last time I checked, autoconfig wasn't > copyrighted.
Oh wait, the 'real autoconf' is called autoconf, not autoconfig (duh) so there is no reason at all to avoid 'make autoconfig'. -- Daniel _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
