On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:58:41AM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > How would I do this with the new syntax, other than:
> > config FTR_A
> > bool
> > depends on BOARD_A || BOARD_B
> > default y
> > ...
> >
> > The desire is to be able to add in support for a new platform, without
> > having to rely on much context to patch (or, have a file be
> > automagically included.
>
> You can do this:
>
> config FTR_A
> bool
> default y if BOARD_A
>
> ...
>
> config FTR_A
> bool
> default y if BOARD_B
>
> lkc takes the first default where the dependency is different from 'n',
> so the result is basically the same as "BOARD_A || BOARD_B".
> BTW the type definition is also only needed once (it only must be the
> same everywhere).
> Does that would you need?
I think that will do. So I can do something like:
config BOARD_A
bool "Board A"
help
...
config BOARD_B
bool "Board B"
help
...
config FTR_A
bool
default y if BOARD_A
config FTR_B
bool
default y if BOARD_A
config FTR_A
default y if BOARD_B
?
Now, can that be done any smaller? (one line, after it's defined once)
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
kbuild-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
