Hi, On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> Basically, what I'm saying is, I see no need for the existing .so in > the kernel build, much less another one. Static libraries are ever so > much easier to manage. If you want to limit people to the config tools in the kernel, there is indeed no need for a shared library. Note that during the next development cycle all graphical front ends are possibly removed. bye, Roman ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
