On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:19:59AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
[]
> > So, there are some new scripts. What if my proposition will be better,
> > so to speak? Any problems i'm willing to fix/enhance.
> > 
> > Note: only one copy of the file required. Sym-linked name *diff* or
> > *patch* will process patches. I know, that symlinks in sources isn't
> > good, thus change "$0" -> "$1" will process first parameter.
> 
> Sorry - but I really do not get your point here.
> Are you trying to say that current cleanpatch is not good enough
> or do you propose a new script to do something similar?

Better means, less bloated scripts in the source tree to make
userspace suck less...

> We do not want everyones favorite patch preprocessing script
> in the kernel. So the only option is to incorporate changes in
> cleanpatch.

I don't see scripts/clean* in .21, so decided, to make a hopefully
better, nicer unix-way and posix re-write, this morning.
____

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
kbuild-devel mailing list
kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel

Reply via email to