On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:46:25PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:19:14AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > I seem to always be the one with the kbuild corner cases... > > > > As part of my x86 setup rewrite, there has been some concern that using > > asm(".code16gcc"); isn't as safe as it should be (because of gcc > > reordering), and making it safe apparently means disabling optimizations > > that adds at least 5% to the code size. Not really a huge deal, but > > undesirable in the long run. > > > > The alternative is to compile to a .s file and then inject ".code16gcc" > > to the top of the .s file before assembling it into a .o file. This > > means overriding some of kbuild's implicit rules, and I'm not sure how > > to do that cleanly. > > As part of my kbuild/kconfig pre-rewrite info collecting... whatever :) > > I did asm-offsets build rewrite RFC four week ago: > <http://mid.gmane.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > You may be interested in it. But Sam is busy, nothing happend since > then.
Just returned from a nice 2 week vacation with no Internet access and no computer turned on (not counting the GPS). And still lacking behind on other stuff too. Sam ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel