On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 02:15:57AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > * Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:26:54 +0200 > > >> read.o <- read.c > > It will only do this if you ask for it. > > The question was what happened when you did make read.o > > > >> foo.o <- foo.c > >> bar.o <- bar.c > >> built-in.o <- read.c foo.c bar.c > >> > >> (cf. default current: > >> built-in.o <- read.o foo.o bar.o) > > > > And this discussion is btw. mood. If the general opinion is that we shall > > include the -combine support all the kbuild infrastructure will anyway > > be redone. > > There are several small things that are not addressed in todays > > implementation and that will be fixed one way or the other. > > Did they get addressed year later or not? What they were (are)?
Actually "Were they got addressed?" ____ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
