On Wed, Oct 12, Keith Owens wrote: > There is kdba_verify_rw(), I can always add a kdba_verify_r() function > as well.
The ppc64 version of kdba_verify_rw looks broken, not very stackfriendly. > >I will add such a check to kdba_bt_stack_ppc now. How do other archs > >deal with 'bt 72' (which should have been 'btp 72')? > > ia64 does not allow bt <address>, because of the strange ia64 unwind > data. Other architectures such as i386 and x86_64 just use the > address, if it is invalid then you get an oops, kdb recovers from the > oops and continues. I checked xmon, and it appears to works the same way. Apparently something in that area is not properly implemented in the ppc64 part of kdb. -- short story of a lazy sysadmin: alias appserv=wotan --------------------------- Use http://oss.sgi.com/ecartis to modify your settings or to unsubscribe.
