Hi. On Monday 27 March 2006 11:32, Jack Vogel wrote: > On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 08:00:46AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On Sunday 26 March 2006 21:58, Peter Wainwright wrote: > > > Is KDB still maintained for the x86_64 architecture? oss.sgi.com has > > > x86_64 patches for kernel 2.6.14 but not for more recent > > > kernels. I tried to forward-port it to 2.6.16 myself but it is > > > not giving a proper backtrace (%rsp seems to be wrong at breakpoints). > > > > > > Peter Wainwright > > > > I would find it useful too. I've forward ported it as well, and also have > > the same backtrace problem. I guess it's probably simple to fix, but it > > doesn't irk me enough that I've bothered to try to fix it. > > > > Regards, > > > > Nigel > > Did you have the problem with the last patch, there was > some backtrace changes that I accepted that I did not have > time to test. It would be useful if you could check a before > and after of that code.
I've only had x86_64 for a few months, so haven't tried an earlier version of the patch. I'll see if I can find some time to try an older version this evening, if you like. Are the changes specific to one file? Regards, Nigel -- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEJ0LgN0y+n1M3mo0RAgvcAJ9cZpax6CPrTUQhqEb9j8pVUz49WwCeP2nw uKyC0fwLIoZzzjYHlf/zyT0= =tcbT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------- Use http://oss.sgi.com/ecartis to modify your settings or to unsubscribe.
