On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:15:39AM +0200, Louis Rilling wrote: > Do you intend to support kdb modules? If yes, in which extent should they be > adapted?
I think that would be a very low priority. What would be useful is the hack to load debuginfo into kdb so that it can pretty-print arbitrary structures. That alone would replace about 90% of the kdb modules I think. And yes, that code in current kdb is even more ugly than core kdb, so it would need a major cleanup first. _______________________________________________ kdb mailing list [email protected] http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/kdb
