On Thu, 2009-12-24 at 05:55 -0600, Jason Wessel wrote: > The remainder was a port from the original kdb, and should not been > needed. The preempt_disable and preempt_enable should be able to be > safely called while the system in the kgdb exception context, so this > chunk of code is going to get axed and re-tested.
Ok, thanks! _______________________________________________ kdb mailing list [email protected] http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/kdb
