https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505591

Ismael Asensio <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REPORTED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |UPSTREAM

--- Comment #1 from Ismael Asensio <[email protected]> ---
This is a limitation of the legacy wetter.com API we use, and unfortunately
there's little we can do about it.

This service only offers the small set of capabilities we already show in the
applet (3-day forecast, no current data, no warnings), and not the whole data
they have on their web. This legacy API hasn't been removed from the site, but
it is no longer documented or even advertised, and it is like "frozen in time".
It still works for the plasma applet because it has been a long-time user, but
it's not guaranteed in the future.

That's why using this provider is discouraged, and only shown in case there are
no alternatives. Beside the local providers, the BBC UK Met provider also
offers a worldwide coverage with a bigger set of capabilities, and should be
used if possible. I resisted to remove it completely because it still may be
helpful for some locations that are not available otherwise, even if not as
complete (unfortunate if that's your case, but the alternative would be no data
at all). 

Note we cannot also update to a new version of the API, because those are paid
services, or a small free trial with a limit of 100 requests per day, so only
apt for small personal projects and not one with the amount of users Plasma
has.
(See https://www.meteonomiqs.com/de/wetter-api and
https://www.meteonomiqs.com/de/wetter-api/) 

Thank you for compiling so good bug reports, with all the info perfectly
explained and separated for each issue.
I'm afraid though, that I'll have to close this and the other ones related to
wetter.com capabilities, which solution is not something on our hands.

There may be options to add new providers and it's something I'm looking
forward to, but there's some big internal re-work we need to do first to make
that possible. In general, we'll opt for real open sources, specially from
governments and public institutions, because unlike private weather portals,
those are free to use in their full capability.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to