https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507758
--- Comment #3 from [email protected] --- (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #2) > Why? What's so different about system-installed Flatpaks that they should be > excluded by default? What about distros where Flatpaks are set up to be > system-installed by default? In this case, when the user installs a Flatpak, > it would be hidden by default. > > I don't think this makes sense given the way Flatpak works, sorry. I see, thank you for the clarification. I didn't know about distros that install flatpaks system-wide by default. My goal with this request was to show the user only what he specifically installed, without displaying dependencies by default, since this can confuse a non tech-savvy user with names such as "org.freedesktop.Sdk.Compat.i386". They might think "what is this? I didn't install it". But you're right, the system-installed flatpaks defeats the purpose of my request. I just thought it would be cool to make the interface more user-friendly by default, with a toggle for advanced users. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
